Keep Workplace Misconduct Out of Higher Education

Hiring the right candidates for positions in academia and higher education requires a watchful eye. Thorough screening of higher education professionals can help prevent universities from hiring applicants with a bad track record, keeping campuses safe for students, staff, and faculty.

Request a Demo

Impact of Misconduct in
Higher Ed

Academic institutions often have a culture of hierarchy among staff and faculty, creating opportunities to engage in misconduct. 
$27 Billion

is wasted each year as a result of turnover from harassment in higher education

Over 58%

of female faculty and staff members have been sexually harassed during their careers

What Happens When Misconduct Issues Aren’t Addressed Pre-Hire

Higher education institutions are responsible for developing students into future workers and leaders and conducting important research to advance fields of studies. The best way to accomplish that is through academic integrity, inclusion, and safe working and learning environments. Misconduct creates unsafe work and learning environments, impacts the credibility of the institution, and hinders students’ ability to learn and grow. 

While serving as president of LSU, F. King Alexander was reprimanded for his mishandling of sexual misconduct allegations against LSU football coach Les Miles. Alexander was aware of Coach Miles’ actions against several female students, and refused to take action or remove Miles from his position. His choice to keep a dangerous man on a college campus shows a clear message about his own leadership style and his inability to protect students under his watch. 

When Alexander was later hired as president of OSU, the OSU community and student body knew he could not be trusted to fulfill the goals of the institution. He resigned as OSU president after just nine months, following issuance of probation from the board of trustees and a senate faculty vote of “no confidence”. 

Had OSU hired a leader that worked with integrity, they wouldn’t have had to replace their president after just nine months and would have maintained trust and a positive reputation in the community and among the student body.  OSU’s hiring of Alexander resulted not only in a 2nd, costly presidential search, but more importantly a positive and trusted reputation with the community and student body.

Workplace Harassment Rampant in Academic Institutions 

Workplace Harassment Rampant in Academic Institutions 

At present, Academic Institutions are rife with workplace misconduct, including workplace harassment, intolerance, and sexual misconduct. Over 18% of education candidates have misconduct issues. Building a community of trust and respect among employees means hiring high-quality faculty and staff.

Academia and Higher Education Institutions with the following risk factors are likely to see increases in misconduct:

  • Workplaces with “high value” employees
  • Workplaces with significant power disparities
Click To Download

Benefits of Online Candidate Screening for Academic Roles

Identifying candidates who may engage in workplace misconduct in higher education positions before it's too late can greatly impact employee retention rates and contribute to a safe campus climate. 

  • Retain high-quality faculty hires
  • Create safe and positive working and learning environments for employees and students
  • Maintain a positive reputation in the community
  • Attract and retain the best and brightest students 
  • Increase application rates 

Online screening solutions will identify previous cases of misconduct before they step foot onto campus.