Latest e-Book
The Legality of Online Screening
New technologies bring new legal questions. Whether you’re trying to understand best practices or the FCRA, Fama has worked with one of the nation’s top employment lawyers to get you the answers you need on the legality of digital screening.
Read ItAll e-Books
The Toxic Employee Handbook
Learn MoreThe Legality of Online Screening
Learn MoreThe Cost of a Toxic Hire
Learn MoreThe Industry Benchmarking Report
Learn MoreDownload The Toxic Employee Handbook
Few hiring managers, recruiters or HR professionals are fully aware of the costs that come from toxic employees. Written by Dr. John Sullivan, the “Michael Jordan of Hiring,” this handbook clarifies the range of damages caused by toxic employees and shows you how to prevent them from ever coming on board.
All fields are required.
Download The Legality of Online Screening
New technologies bring new legal questions. Whether you’re trying to understand best practices or the FCRA, Fama has worked with one of the nation’s top employment lawyers to get you the answers you need on the legality of digital screening.
All fields are required.
Download The Cost of a Toxic Hire
Toxic employees can go unnoticed for years and can ravage the bottom line. Working with our clients and the broader research community, we’ve found fresh data showing that toxic hires cost more than you might think.
All fields are required.
Download The Industry Benchmarking Report
Our breakthrough report combines anonymized industry data with leading research to explain why online data is critical for keeping your company safe from bad hires. Find out how online behaviors are impacting your bottom line and discover which industries are experiencing the consequences of toxic behavior.
All fields are required.
Additional Insights
The Evolution Of Background Checks
Learn MoreFama’s Approach to Legal Compliance
Learn MoreThe Case For Automated vs. Manual Screening
Learn MoreDownload The Evolution Of Background Checks
A growing number of traditional background checks no longer cover the range of risks that employers need to avoid in the 21st century. As a result, new screening methods are emerging to help companies form a more complete picture of the people they hire and trust. Find out how background checks have evolved to help employers manage risk today.
All fields are required.
Download Fama’s Approach to Legal Compliance
The process of screening online content can be fraught with unease. Between the legal, operational, and human aspects of online screening, it can feel like there are a million questions and not many answers. Discover how Fama helps you maintain rigid compliance in the screening process so you can focus on HR success instead.
All fields are required.
Download The Case For Automated vs. Manual Screening
Browsing candidates’ online profiles during the hiring process has become a common practice. However, employers often don’t realize how manual screening methods can hurt their business. Learn more about the ways that manual screening can create costs for employers, and discover what an automated online screening process can offer.
All fields are required.
Recently on Twitter
Social screening is becoming increasingly common, but it can also put quality candidates on edge. Here’s how leading HR executives are ensuring that their screening process doesn’t pose a risk to their hiring goals. https://hubs.ly/H0mGw0K0
How does social screening address various pain points in the hiring process? David Bloom from @sterlingcheck discusses why more and more organizations are looking to social screening and why it's so important for business success today. https://hubs.ly/H0mCXk80
Social media screening can be done legally and ethically, and it's rapidly getting smarter and easier to use. Find out more here via @businessdotcom
https://hubs.ly/H0mCNPf0
#screening #automation #hiring #AI #SocialMedia #BackgroundCheck #culture #SocialScreening
Find Us on Social Media
Get in touch!
Help Your
Company Fight
Toxic Behavior
One of our team members will reach out to you directly.